ExplainedSecurity & Defence

The Dragon's Fire: Assessing India's Need for a Dedicated Rocket Force

With China's expanding missile arsenal along the LAC, a debate is intensifying within India's strategic community on the necessity of creating a unified command for all long-range conventional strike assets. We explain the threat, the proposal, and the implications.

June 30, 20267 min read

What is the strategic challenge prompting this debate?

The primary driver for this debate is the growing conventional missile superiority of China's People's Liberation Army Rocket Force (PLARF). According to strategic assessments, China has deployed more than 200 conventional missile launchers in its Western Theatre Command, which is responsible for the India-China border (Source: The Hindu, June 30, 2026). These include DF-15B, DF-16, and DF-21C missiles, and the dual-role (conventional/nuclear) DF-26 Intermediate-Range Ballistic Missile (IRBM). The source material highlights that two key missile bases at Korla and Kunming can hold most of India at risk.

China's operationalisation of hypersonic missiles like the DF-100 and CJ-1000 presents a further challenge. These weapons travel at over five times the speed of sound and can manoeuvre in flight, making them extremely difficult for current Indian air defence systems to intercept. This capability, combined with the geographical advantage of launching from the high-altitude Tibetan Plateau, reduces missile detection and reaction times for India. The core of the challenge, as articulated by analyst Harinder Singh, is a doctrinal divergence: China views conventional missiles as active instruments of war-fighting, potentially to paralyse India's response in the opening hours of a conflict.

What are India's current capabilities and limitations?

India possesses a diverse inventory of missiles developed by the DRDO, including the BrahMos supersonic cruise missile, the Nirbhay long-range subsonic cruise missile, and the Agni series of ballistic missiles. However, these assets are currently distributed across the Army, Navy, Air Force, and the Strategic Forces Command (SFC), which handles nuclear weapons. There is no single, unified command responsible for planning and executing conventional long-range precision strikes.

This distributed structure creates several limitations. According to the source material, India's long-range systems are yet to be fully integrated into a cohesive war-fighting network, with challenges in robust, real-time targeting capabilities. Missile stockpiles are described as 'finite', raising questions about sustainability in a prolonged conflict. Technologically, India is still in the development phase for hypersonic missile technology, whereas China has already deployed such systems. The absence of a unified command means that targeting priorities might remain service-specific, undermining the optimal use of these assets in a joint operational scenario.

Free to read

Keep reading this explainer

This is the opening of a 1533-word explainer. An account brings you the rest, a PDF to keep and the whole Explained archive.

Takes about a minute. Your email and a password is all it needs.